Get In Touch
Our customer support team is available for help.
Celigo

Short answer: Celigo does not publish a price list, so there is no single Celigo price. You pay a quoted subscription based on edition, endpoints, flows, environments and any add-ons, plus the cost of implementing and owning the integrations.
Public price signals exist, but they are orientation, not quotes. Vendr’s February 2026 dataset reports a median of $14,787 a year across 253 purchases, with contracts between $6,514 and $35,988. The AWS Marketplace lists a Standard annual licence at $36,000.
The subscription is only part of the budget. Designing, building, testing and owning the integrations usually decides what a Celigo programme really costs, so this guide covers both.
The short version for a buyer.
Celigo is an integration platform, and its pricing page says pricing is based on endpoints and flows, not on tasks, data volume or vCores. Those two units describe the work your integration estate asks the platform to do.
Celigo counts endpoints by rule rather than by connection, which matters more than most buyers expect:
Several independent variables set the price, so no single list price fits every buyer. The edition sets the endpoints and flows listed for your plan, along with environments, concurrency, retention and the support package. Add-ons and separately licensed products then change the quote again:
Key takeaway. Different estates are driven by different units. An ecommerce estate is endpoint heavy, an EDI estate is trading-partner heavy, and a regulated business is driven by environments, security and retention. A quote that looks right on endpoints can still miss the product that actually drives the cost.
The table shows the criteria that most often separate one edition from another in a buying decision, as Celigo publishes them.
| Buyer criterion | Standard | Professional | Enterprise |
|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoints | 3 | 3 | Unlimited |
| Flows | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Environments | 1 production | 1 production, 1 non-production | 1 production, 2 non-production |
| Single sign-on | Add-on | Available | Available |
| Concurrency | 25 | 50 (add-on only) | 50 |
| On-premise agent | Add-on | Add-on | Add-on |
| API Builder | Add-on | Available | Available |
| Change data capture | Not available | Available | Available |
| Audit logs and log retention | 1 year, 30 days | 2 years, 60 days | 3 years, 180 days |
| Support package | Essential | Preferred | Premier |
One point surprises many buyers: Standard and Professional list the same 3 endpoints and 20 flows. The choice between them turns on capabilities such as environments, SSO and retention, not on endpoint or flow allowances.
ERP Peers assessment. This is professional guidance, not an official Celigo rule.
Three public sources give a price signal. None of them is a Celigo quote, and they measure different things.
| Source | Figure | Current or historical | What it does not tell you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vendr | Median $14,787 a year. Contracts from $6,514 to $35,988. | Current. February 2026 dataset of 253 purchases. | Transacted contract values. It does not say which edition, add-ons or term each buyer chose. |
| AWS Marketplace | Standard annual licence at $36,000 per 12 months. | Current listing, undated. | A published list price for one edition. It shows no discount, no other edition and no implementation work. |
| Salesforce AppExchange | Standard Edition at $18,900 a year. | Historical. Listing last updated in 2022. | An older listing. Use it as history, not as a current price. |
How to read the signals:
Key takeaway. Do not average the three figures into a typical price, because they describe different things. Use them to sense-check a quote, and ask Celigo which edition, term and add-ons any figure covers.
Most budget surprises come from scope that was not visible at quote time. These are the factors we see change a Celigo budget most:
These scenarios show how requirements translate into an edition to evaluate. They are illustrations, not quotes or prices.
Implementation effort: Lower
Implementation effort: Medium
Implementation effort: Higher
In each case the licence conversation goes better when the endpoint and flow list exists before the call. A lower licence requirement does not necessarily mean a lower implementation cost, so look at a scenario’s effort as well as its edition.
The licence is not the project budget. Beyond the subscription, a Celigo programme normally includes:
Which of these dominates depends on how much of the integration is standard and how much is yours. Our assessment of effort is deliberately qualitative, because published project prices would mislead more than they help:
Ownership shapes the long-term cost more than the build does. Decide early whether an internal owner, a partner or a mix will run the integrations, and what your ongoing Celigo support should cover once the project is live.
If you plan to build in-house, a Celigo developer can carry the initial build while your own team learns the platform and takes over the monitoring.
Work through these steps internally before you talk to Celigo or any implementation partner. They turn a vague request into a scope that can be priced and compared.
| Planning item | What to record | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Systems to connect | Every application, database, file server and API, with its owner. | Each distinct system is a candidate endpoint and an integration workstream. |
| Endpoints | Distinct apps after merging same-app connections, same-host databases and same-URI APIs. | Sets the edition conversation and any extra endpoint pricing. |
| Directions and objects | For each pair, which objects move which way, such as orders, items or payments. | Each direction and object is usually its own flow. |
| Flows | A first list of flows with priority and a rough build effort. | Compares against the 20 flows listed for each edition. |
| Timing and volume | Real-time or scheduled, peak transaction counts and seasonal spikes. | Drives design, concurrency and error handling. |
| Environments | How you test and approve changes before production. | Decides whether you need a non-production environment. |
| Security and access | SSO, role separation, audit and retention requirements. | Separates editions and add-ons. |
| B2B and API needs | EDI trading partners and document types, and any APIs you will expose. | Sizes B2B Manager and API Management. |
| Monitoring and ownership | Who watches errors, who fixes mappings, who approves enhancements. | Decides support level and the post-go-live budget. |
| Implementation support | What you will build in-house and what you need a partner for. | Defines the services budget outside the licence. |
Put these to Celigo and to any implementation partner, and record the answers in writing.
For many NetSuite-centred estates, yes. Whether it is right for you depends on your integrations, governance needs, internal ownership and implementation complexity. Our Celigo NetSuite integration page explains what that work involves in practice.
Celigo is likely a good fit when…
Consider a lighter or different option when…
If you are weighing alternatives, our comparison of Celigo, Boomi and MuleSoft for NetSuite sets out how each vendor structures its pricing, so you can compare units and not just headline numbers.
ERP Peers is an authorized Celigo Partner with a Celigo-certified integration team. When we scope Celigo work, we weigh licensing alongside architecture, implementation scope and long-term ownership, because the aim is to avoid both overbuying and under-scoping. A licence sized too generously wastes budget, and a project scoped too narrowly returns later as change requests and unplanned support.
Celigo changes its packaging over time, so confirm current terms with Celigo before you budget.
Planning a Celigo programme?
We can help you identify your systems, endpoints, flows, environment requirements, implementation complexity and ownership needs, so the conversation with Celigo starts from a scope you can compare.
Our customer support team is available for help.
Need help with NetSuite?
Chat with our team.